Anonymous
8/6/2025, 3:13:19 AM
No.11350147
>>11350064
first of all, smegma NEVER happens. rule34 and civit even banned it, so even if i wanted to find it, i am at a complete loss, now, besides maybe (maybe) seeing a >>>/trash/slop genner whose style allows for it (rather, whom i assume chased their style at least in part specifically for such) do it there. ai also often simply doesn't even understand smegma, so it's usually bad, anyway. ONE (1) smegma gen inspired by me shoehorning pee and smegma into my gratuitous captions the majority does not make
secondly (though this is kind of a muted point, but to just say it out loud anyway), it will always be true that out of context, a conceivable interpretation of being definitively "/d/" is approaching the most horrifying thing possible. but it will also always be true that futa is the most conventionally /d/ subject matter. so futa being shoved into a containment board for horrifying monsters is definitely odd, but it's not like this two things are met equally, even if the platform makes you respect them both for belonging as if they're the same
thirdly, i literally got some half a dozen (You)s basically telling me to kill myself once cause in response to someone asserting that a futa topping a man is straight, i postulated that topping is the male sex position, and bottoming is the female sex position. granted, to the anti-intellectual party, the more effort you put into your argument, the more wrong you are, so that inflated the mad factor by a lot. but the point is, i always knew it was a silent majority who preferred futa tops. but after that, i knew not to step on their toes anymore, lest i incur their wrath. i assure you that even if you don't get consistent (You)s, [everyone liked that], especially because some genners don't do anything but 1girl, which gets brought up every now and then, realistically because they want to see the futa topping
first of all, smegma NEVER happens. rule34 and civit even banned it, so even if i wanted to find it, i am at a complete loss, now, besides maybe (maybe) seeing a >>>/trash/slop genner whose style allows for it (rather, whom i assume chased their style at least in part specifically for such) do it there. ai also often simply doesn't even understand smegma, so it's usually bad, anyway. ONE (1) smegma gen inspired by me shoehorning pee and smegma into my gratuitous captions the majority does not make
secondly (though this is kind of a muted point, but to just say it out loud anyway), it will always be true that out of context, a conceivable interpretation of being definitively "/d/" is approaching the most horrifying thing possible. but it will also always be true that futa is the most conventionally /d/ subject matter. so futa being shoved into a containment board for horrifying monsters is definitely odd, but it's not like this two things are met equally, even if the platform makes you respect them both for belonging as if they're the same
thirdly, i literally got some half a dozen (You)s basically telling me to kill myself once cause in response to someone asserting that a futa topping a man is straight, i postulated that topping is the male sex position, and bottoming is the female sex position. granted, to the anti-intellectual party, the more effort you put into your argument, the more wrong you are, so that inflated the mad factor by a lot. but the point is, i always knew it was a silent majority who preferred futa tops. but after that, i knew not to step on their toes anymore, lest i incur their wrath. i assure you that even if you don't get consistent (You)s, [everyone liked that], especially because some genners don't do anything but 1girl, which gets brought up every now and then, realistically because they want to see the futa topping