>>11353442
>Oddly aggressive response, but ok?
you didn't even acknowledge the 1/7 thing, so i don't even see any reason to entertain your reply beyond this egregiously dishonest part i have to respond to:
>And even if she was an elf, it still wouldn't be human on human slavery, elves generally being regarded as non-human.
you convinced me. which is why pokemon would literally just have a human with long ears as a "pokemon", which you literally claimed gardevoir was in your previous post:
>But Gardevoir's just an elf girl basically.
everyone can see it. gardevoir = human with long ears, which you call an "elf". that makes her have a human face, which is why when coincidentally 1/7 gens of her didn't get deleted, it means she's allowed to be posted here. it is the rational conclusion to draw

not responding anymore