Anonymous
8/11/2025, 2:10:11 AM
No.11353537
>>11353081
You pokefuckers always forget the other half of the issue. Even if pokemon aren't furry, they're still not allowed on /d/ because of bestiality. Pokemon are animals, since the general public is a bit more OK with owning animals (pets) than owning people (slaves) and having them fight for your entertainment. Pokemon would need to first pass the John Harnkness test (have human-level intelligence, ability to communicate and provide consent, and be mature) before they can leave the beast zone. Then you can talk about whether your sex slave is a furry or not.
TL;DR: Regardless of whether pokemon are beast or fur, neither belongs on /d/
You pokefuckers always forget the other half of the issue. Even if pokemon aren't furry, they're still not allowed on /d/ because of bestiality. Pokemon are animals, since the general public is a bit more OK with owning animals (pets) than owning people (slaves) and having them fight for your entertainment. Pokemon would need to first pass the John Harnkness test (have human-level intelligence, ability to communicate and provide consent, and be mature) before they can leave the beast zone. Then you can talk about whether your sex slave is a furry or not.
TL;DR: Regardless of whether pokemon are beast or fur, neither belongs on /d/