Anonymous
8/11/2025, 4:04:11 AM
No.11353585
>>11353551
it is me!!! 「smegma-anon」 (also called 「caption anon」once by ornateanon once). which btw, i haven't made a caption all thread cause i felt i made my magnum opus last thread dialogue-wise, so i was trying to learn how to edit in smegma myself, but i procrastinate so much, so it's now been three (3) days of me just scratching my balls about it
and!!!! that is AMAZING!!!! seriously!!!! to just vaguely tell you what's good about it, i am once again citing a post i made linking basically all the smegma done well i'd seen at the time:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11288567/#11293356
and here's another i've seen do it from >>>/trash//slop since then:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/76143928/#76148568
and the main thing is just that ai doesn't tend to understand smegma, so it tends to be just a bunch of circles, as i pointed out a particulaly egregious example of in the post of mine i linked. but not only do you evade that, but yours actually has mass, and casts its own shadow!!! this is like super gratuitous stuff!!! not every artist even does it like this!!! and it looks GOOD!!!! really!!! if you cared more for the minutiae of unwashed pps, objectively the part on the underside of the dick shouldn't be there, since it should only be on the wrinkly part right below the glans, that gets exposed from peeling back the foreskin. but some artists cheat and put smegma outside the foreskin anyway:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9101980
another objective thing is that it should be smeared on the glans as well, because even though there isn't much space for the smegma (as opposed to right below the glans), the friction from the skin retracting and going back should still put trace amounts of it on the glans. it's usually depicted by fading rings, similar to lipstick deepthroat, if you've seen that. but, again, often artists just neglect that, too:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=14417335
so, you did it well!! really!!!
it is me!!! 「smegma-anon」 (also called 「caption anon」once by ornateanon once). which btw, i haven't made a caption all thread cause i felt i made my magnum opus last thread dialogue-wise, so i was trying to learn how to edit in smegma myself, but i procrastinate so much, so it's now been three (3) days of me just scratching my balls about it
and!!!! that is AMAZING!!!! seriously!!!! to just vaguely tell you what's good about it, i am once again citing a post i made linking basically all the smegma done well i'd seen at the time:
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11288567/#11293356
and here's another i've seen do it from >>>/trash//slop since then:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/76143928/#76148568
and the main thing is just that ai doesn't tend to understand smegma, so it tends to be just a bunch of circles, as i pointed out a particulaly egregious example of in the post of mine i linked. but not only do you evade that, but yours actually has mass, and casts its own shadow!!! this is like super gratuitous stuff!!! not every artist even does it like this!!! and it looks GOOD!!!! really!!! if you cared more for the minutiae of unwashed pps, objectively the part on the underside of the dick shouldn't be there, since it should only be on the wrinkly part right below the glans, that gets exposed from peeling back the foreskin. but some artists cheat and put smegma outside the foreskin anyway:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9101980
another objective thing is that it should be smeared on the glans as well, because even though there isn't much space for the smegma (as opposed to right below the glans), the friction from the skin retracting and going back should still put trace amounts of it on the glans. it's usually depicted by fading rings, similar to lipstick deepthroat, if you've seen that. but, again, often artists just neglect that, too:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=14417335
so, you did it well!! really!!!