smegma warning. original from >>>/d/ddg:
>>11365103

edit #36

in this edit i started schizoing-out about whether duplicating the gaussian blur layers too quickly was making them bolder somehow, but i assume i just blanked and did something wrong myself... i still am now paranoid, and will only dupe the layers after seeing the effect of the previous dupe visibly happen, though...
>>11365405
inkscape automates that for you, though. see >>11351694
>https://files.catbox.moe/geumji.mp4
also, anon shared a standardized font list here, if you haven't seen it to know what some options are >>11361958
and i agree that verbosity is the only way to play, really, haha. but people who don't get it just call it yapping. it stings a bit, but you can just discard them for not being part of your audience, anyway, so it is what it is. i once had someone even say that the "image" was nice, but that they wish the caption was shorter, so it obscured less of it. i thought they were praising the caption, but merely thought that it was either overstaying its welcome, or was superfluous. nope; they clarified that the caption "was okay too", but it's just covering the image period, therefore it should be shorter. i was in shock. i just didn't respond

about grammatical errors, i manually transcribed it, and proposed some corrections here:
https://rentry.co/diq7v75x