Anonymous
8/30/2025, 10:19:54 AM
No.11366820
original by blurry eyes in >>>/d/ddg:
>>11366594
edit #40. request #6 >>11366533
>please do more cum log captions.
it took me making this caption to realize it, but i think what i felt was off about my last caption >>11366174 was that the "stroke" (outline) and proportional gaussian blur "stroke" layers were too bold. the reference i use for the font/"stroke" sizes are 1536 image width = 50 font + 3 "stroke". in this case, that meant ~41 font + 2.4375 "stroke". ever since my "drug trip" caption >>11357596, i've been rounding up 2 "stroke" to 3. but now that i have the gaussian blur "stroke" layers for added contrast, i think i shouldn't anymore
>>11366533
i simply don't have any material to do any more cum log captions for, though. that last one was actually my second one; the first is >>11364053 if you haven't seen it. the genner who's doing these in /ddg/ downloaded a lora specifically to do them, so more gens of them must exist out there somewhere, but i don't know how to find them. before the /ddg/ genner made these, the only ones i'd seen were some low-quality ones on an imageboard that's wordfiltered here, which i posted screenshots of the thumbnails of here >>11363751
>https://files.catbox.moe/vm9yve.png
since then, i also found a genner who did it a few times. here's an example:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=12169680
https://x.com/FUTAALOVERX/status/1874798223417827439
the art style is appealing, but the cocks are a bit hyper for my tastes, and there is little opportunity for casual dialogue when it's a naked girl in public, or bottomless schoolgirl (i really hate bottomless, since it's just the opposite of casual). and they're all touching their dicks- which the one i linked is okay about, since she doesn't have much of a handle on it, but still-, which makes it way less casual, too. there's just not much i can do with these gens, even if i wanted. so as far as i can tell, this is the last of the subject matter i can do for now
>>11366594
edit #40. request #6 >>11366533
>please do more cum log captions.
it took me making this caption to realize it, but i think what i felt was off about my last caption >>11366174 was that the "stroke" (outline) and proportional gaussian blur "stroke" layers were too bold. the reference i use for the font/"stroke" sizes are 1536 image width = 50 font + 3 "stroke". in this case, that meant ~41 font + 2.4375 "stroke". ever since my "drug trip" caption >>11357596, i've been rounding up 2 "stroke" to 3. but now that i have the gaussian blur "stroke" layers for added contrast, i think i shouldn't anymore
>>11366533
i simply don't have any material to do any more cum log captions for, though. that last one was actually my second one; the first is >>11364053 if you haven't seen it. the genner who's doing these in /ddg/ downloaded a lora specifically to do them, so more gens of them must exist out there somewhere, but i don't know how to find them. before the /ddg/ genner made these, the only ones i'd seen were some low-quality ones on an imageboard that's wordfiltered here, which i posted screenshots of the thumbnails of here >>11363751
>https://files.catbox.moe/vm9yve.png
since then, i also found a genner who did it a few times. here's an example:
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=12169680
https://x.com/FUTAALOVERX/status/1874798223417827439
the art style is appealing, but the cocks are a bit hyper for my tastes, and there is little opportunity for casual dialogue when it's a naked girl in public, or bottomless schoolgirl (i really hate bottomless, since it's just the opposite of casual). and they're all touching their dicks- which the one i linked is okay about, since she doesn't have much of a handle on it, but still-, which makes it way less casual, too. there's just not much i can do with these gens, even if i wanted. so as far as i can tell, this is the last of the subject matter i can do for now