>>11366820
i ran out of space, but about my editing logic, i've always struggled with square images, since once i started calculating font size using width (or otherwise the narrowest side of the image), i quickly realized that if an image is square, the font size is actually much bigger proportionally than i expect it to be, so i have little real estate to put a caption. so far i've been dealing with it in non-standardized ways, or just tanking it if i could, but i think i've settled on standardizing it by converting the image to 13:19 ratio, which i know nothing about drawing/photography or maybe just aesthetic aspect ratios, but 1248x1824 seems to be a fairly common res for gens, which is 13:19. i'm kinda retarded, though, so i couldn't figure out how to convert square image resolutions to 13:19 using any online calculator, so i watched a youtube video on how to calculate it manually:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZoTDpK5fLo

i only needed to watch the first minute of it to get it. so finally standardizing font sizes for square images is nice
>>11366517
ooh, sorry; i thought "ai" wasn't a misspelling of "i", so you were saying you were using ai in the drawing process somehow. i understand, now, sorry about that