>>11373305
sorry, i think you completely misunderstood what i was trying to say. there're two topics you responded to:
>my finding my writing to be a translated version of my creativity, which i as such wish for appreciation for, since i do it exclusively for others
>my saying i could view drawing as something i do for the sake of leaving a "legacy"
and i don't think you understood and responded to either of my points, sorry. on the first topic, the first two of your examples (identifying as a writer and not writing anything, and having written multiple books but not identifying as a writer) seem like a complete non sequitur to anything i said. or, maybe it /is/ in response to something i said, but not what you greentexted. but even responding to it for its own merits anyway, i'm assuming i said i'm not a writer, despite making captions. i've definitely said that on another board, so maybe i said it here. but i don't really follow where you were going with that, sorry. and your third example (being a ghostwriter and never thinking about it again), i guess that /is/ a relevant response to what i said... so, sorry for saying that entire response was a non sequitur, sorry. i guess i felt it got obfuscated by your first two examples. but i don't have much to say about it anyway. i guess people like than and i are just built different. if writing came easier to me, maybe i could see myself as just going through the motions of writing not for appreciation, but just to do it so others don't have to. but i don't know what more to say about that, sorry