>>11400703
>>11400714
> I think you have some good points however I am going to fixate on
>The idea of free near-mindless fuckdolls being given out to every man is such a turn-off for me.
That's the point? Some men will be dissatisfied with easy access? It's a social service that's supposed to sort the wheat from the chaff?
Theoretically, incompetent men lack imagination, thus they have simple needs. If those needs are met, they won't try to scheme for powerful positions where they could cause a lot of trouble.
>Hierarchy of slave girls that kind of resembles what you are talking about but might be better:
Mass spawned women (who are legally obligated to be infertile) merely know how to spread their legs and perform basic bodily functions with minimal mess. These duplicunts will happily sit around all day watching brain rot on girl-tube, oblivious to any greater purpose in life. Middle class women are attentive to their masters needs. Their skill sets ranging from make-up/costume design, cooking, child and health care, to even basic martial arts. These women are useful but their skills are transferable if she is unwilling to work. Upper class women are basically living artworks, tailored to the tastes of wealthy men. That's where you'll find your helpless fuck nuggets and augmented racing ponies and such. Top tier women are still worthless if there isn't a buyer waiting for them somewhere. Thus no woman's value can ever give her enough power to push a feminist agenda through this hypothetical society.

Honestly, I'm just trying to world-build a society where the worst version of myself could get laid with minimal effort.