Anonymous
10/28/2025, 5:56:38 PM
No.11405748
>>11405732
>I know autism is a prerequisite for the fetish but you have to understand that you not liking something doesn't make it objectively and universally bad. It sounds like you had very specific expectations for where the characters and story would go and saw it as an objective mistake when it went in a different direction.
That's pure cope. Nerds explicitly set Emmy up as a good person, then spent 100+ hours of time not allowing her to be a good person. Then instead of embracing that, he tries to outright retcon it in Bad Borken by making the claim that Emmy is the most pure hearted person to ever live in all of history, so pure and innocent that an ancient demonic warlord that literally eats babies had a change of heart because she just existed around them.
Emmy did absolutely nothing to earn that. Even if she'd been a complete Disney princess for the entire game, it would still be a stretch, but we're expected to believe that for someone who nearly got Pro executed because she really, REALLY wanted to eat every single item at a buffet?
Nerds admitted I'm right in this thread, that Emmy wasn't a good enough person and that he should have given her more. "Muh autism," come on.
>the buffet scene wasn't that bad
It was one of the worst moments for Emmy in the whole story. They were both wanted, and as far as they knew, they would be killed immediately if caught. Their lives, the lives of everyone in Lantrum, and her father's fate were all hanging in the balance. You only think it isn't bad because you're retroactively applying meta knowledge. You're also ignoring the fact that while Emmy herself wasn't in as much danger as she appeared to be (there's decent odds the Vizier at least would see her before she was executed), Pro ABSOLUTELY could have been killed, and it's only sheer dumb luck that he wasn't.
The buffet was the first moment where I was fully expecting to have a Purity/Gluttony choice, and was shocked that I didn't.
>I know autism is a prerequisite for the fetish but you have to understand that you not liking something doesn't make it objectively and universally bad. It sounds like you had very specific expectations for where the characters and story would go and saw it as an objective mistake when it went in a different direction.
That's pure cope. Nerds explicitly set Emmy up as a good person, then spent 100+ hours of time not allowing her to be a good person. Then instead of embracing that, he tries to outright retcon it in Bad Borken by making the claim that Emmy is the most pure hearted person to ever live in all of history, so pure and innocent that an ancient demonic warlord that literally eats babies had a change of heart because she just existed around them.
Emmy did absolutely nothing to earn that. Even if she'd been a complete Disney princess for the entire game, it would still be a stretch, but we're expected to believe that for someone who nearly got Pro executed because she really, REALLY wanted to eat every single item at a buffet?
Nerds admitted I'm right in this thread, that Emmy wasn't a good enough person and that he should have given her more. "Muh autism," come on.
>the buffet scene wasn't that bad
It was one of the worst moments for Emmy in the whole story. They were both wanted, and as far as they knew, they would be killed immediately if caught. Their lives, the lives of everyone in Lantrum, and her father's fate were all hanging in the balance. You only think it isn't bad because you're retroactively applying meta knowledge. You're also ignoring the fact that while Emmy herself wasn't in as much danger as she appeared to be (there's decent odds the Vizier at least would see her before she was executed), Pro ABSOLUTELY could have been killed, and it's only sheer dumb luck that he wasn't.
The buffet was the first moment where I was fully expecting to have a Purity/Gluttony choice, and was shocked that I didn't.