>>18565555 (checked)
>But if your grail is a good example of a hard to get seiko that was made for 5 years in the 60s I could understand calling it that.
And that would actually be a good example of a grail because you’d have to put in tons of work to find one that wasn’t beat to shit or repaired so often it’s basically a franken at this point, or polished into oblivion.
Plus, if it was at all a special watch with collectible value, there’s bound to be fakes as well