Anonymous
7/21/2025, 11:21:47 PM
No.76405979
>>76404865
It was not. Do you think people would spend equal amounts of time and money (when photography was more expensive and time consuming and not digital) taking pictures of ugly ass skinny balding dudes vs people who looked halfway decent? Yeah, it's a historical bias. If you only have 36 pictures in a roll of film which you then had to develop which you then had to actually fucking save in a physical photo album, you're not going to waste those shots on a dude that looks like that even if it represented 99.9999% of humanity (it didn't, but you get the point).
It was not. Do you think people would spend equal amounts of time and money (when photography was more expensive and time consuming and not digital) taking pictures of ugly ass skinny balding dudes vs people who looked halfway decent? Yeah, it's a historical bias. If you only have 36 pictures in a roll of film which you then had to develop which you then had to actually fucking save in a physical photo album, you're not going to waste those shots on a dude that looks like that even if it represented 99.9999% of humanity (it didn't, but you get the point).