Anonymous
6/11/2025, 8:28:21 PM
No.105563030
>>105562884
if your development environment is big enough for you to need a NAS you are doing something wrong in the first place.
But anyways feel free to name a better alternative to make your NAS behave with your programs.
Also just tested some non steam vidya and it works so i don't know what you mean by "reading and writing at the same time". Clearly werks for me.
>>105562913
>SSHFS uses SFTP
Which is why i told you to imagine it as a compatibility layer.
>extra encryption overhead
For some its good to have encryption for some its bad. Its a price you have to pay but considering it works on every server that has ssh with no configs i think its fine.
>It's better to use NFS.
I still have to test it but so far SSHFS just worked. I just wanted to show anon that there are simper solutions than installing nextcloud. Why even have a webui of you can just ssh into your server.
>What now?
Some programs like to cache shit that doesn't need to be. When i search for files and their contents in particular it would save them in /tmp and try to crash my system by filing up my RAM when i use bare SFTP. When i do the same on SSHFS it doesn't cache anything which results in faster and more responsive speeds actually, and in my RAM not being raped by it attempting to read files.
Just goes to show how 'native' it seems to the system. Not saying that FTP and HTTP are useless but SSHFS just feels more comfortable to me and improves compatibility immensely in my daily usage.
And again considering how easy its to use and what it brings to the table it might be worth a switch from normal SFTP to it.
if your development environment is big enough for you to need a NAS you are doing something wrong in the first place.
But anyways feel free to name a better alternative to make your NAS behave with your programs.
Also just tested some non steam vidya and it works so i don't know what you mean by "reading and writing at the same time". Clearly werks for me.
>>105562913
>SSHFS uses SFTP
Which is why i told you to imagine it as a compatibility layer.
>extra encryption overhead
For some its good to have encryption for some its bad. Its a price you have to pay but considering it works on every server that has ssh with no configs i think its fine.
>It's better to use NFS.
I still have to test it but so far SSHFS just worked. I just wanted to show anon that there are simper solutions than installing nextcloud. Why even have a webui of you can just ssh into your server.
>What now?
Some programs like to cache shit that doesn't need to be. When i search for files and their contents in particular it would save them in /tmp and try to crash my system by filing up my RAM when i use bare SFTP. When i do the same on SSHFS it doesn't cache anything which results in faster and more responsive speeds actually, and in my RAM not being raped by it attempting to read files.
Just goes to show how 'native' it seems to the system. Not saying that FTP and HTTP are useless but SSHFS just feels more comfortable to me and improves compatibility immensely in my daily usage.
And again considering how easy its to use and what it brings to the table it might be worth a switch from normal SFTP to it.