Anonymous
6/14/2025, 7:23:15 PM
No.105593171
>>105592528
>you believe muh yamanaka factors are a valid aging clock, too. Or perhaps you prefer telomere length.
You're just resorting to making shit up about me now? You do realize that animal research exists, right? Hardly anyone in academia even gives a shit about telomeres and the partial reprogramming crowd is not really that big in the grand scheme of the geroscience community. There's a rich body of research on a million other topics and it's frankly immature and counterproductive to willfully ignore good research to prop up your own fallacious claim that everything sucks (except your brilliant ideas, of course).
>But things can, and will, get better.
Not with your arrogant attitude.
>you believe muh yamanaka factors are a valid aging clock, too. Or perhaps you prefer telomere length.
You're just resorting to making shit up about me now? You do realize that animal research exists, right? Hardly anyone in academia even gives a shit about telomeres and the partial reprogramming crowd is not really that big in the grand scheme of the geroscience community. There's a rich body of research on a million other topics and it's frankly immature and counterproductive to willfully ignore good research to prop up your own fallacious claim that everything sucks (except your brilliant ideas, of course).
>But things can, and will, get better.
Not with your arrogant attitude.