Anonymous
6/19/2025, 2:16:50 AM
No.105636228
>>105636192
>>already low quality grainy starting image to mask shit details of the now also shit grainy video
that's the point, Wan manages to keep the style of the image input, that on itself is impressive, it shows it's not as biased as other models who can't help themselves but to slop the original source
>almost no movement video with just a zoom out
almost as if that's what I asked after all, do you seriously believe that "good = dynamic" and that "slow on purpose = bad"? are you this retarded?
>it's shit for anything other than meme videos to post online here
you're posting on the ultimate meme generator, 4chan, fucking please, you're also the guy who called this "close enough" >>105635964
how much does the furry fag pays you to protect his heckin wholesome model like that? genuine question?
>>already low quality grainy starting image to mask shit details of the now also shit grainy video
that's the point, Wan manages to keep the style of the image input, that on itself is impressive, it shows it's not as biased as other models who can't help themselves but to slop the original source
>almost no movement video with just a zoom out
almost as if that's what I asked after all, do you seriously believe that "good = dynamic" and that "slow on purpose = bad"? are you this retarded?
>it's shit for anything other than meme videos to post online here
you're posting on the ultimate meme generator, 4chan, fucking please, you're also the guy who called this "close enough" >>105635964
how much does the furry fag pays you to protect his heckin wholesome model like that? genuine question?