>>105753668
>People do this shit for muh vidja gaems
I feel like there are adults refusing to grow up complaining about something as..... unproductive as video games, so I can't see whether this campaign will work or not
>but won't do anything like this for privacy or the tech overlords ruling the world.
they have done that, it's called open source
this method is clearly different from petitions, and some have had success
>>105754679
>>105754762
this anon gets it, a good online game should have a self hosted or community managed server
otherwise the game is not worth it
or just play offline games from the start
>>105754830
if it is a license then it should be an open source license, or nothing at all