Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:13:29 PM
No.105755591
>>105755493
>When the other anon said that the Commission is just going to talk about it, and you said that "you don't understand how this works"... what exactly did you mean?
My post(>>105754231) was in response to >>105754179 and >>105754194. >>105754179 claimed it's just a regular online petition and >>105754194 said they don't have to listen or do anything. Which is obviously wrong because ECI is not really a typical online petition and they are obligated to listen and respond. The anon who said they are just going to talk about it(>>105754384) posted few posts after I made my own post. 105754384 is bigger than 105754384. He is obviously right, they are only legally obligated to listen and respond, not to accept any proposed law, which is something I have said so multiple times ITT.
>Did you want to imply that this actually has the chance to change something?
Yes there is.
>Or did you actually always know that you will only "get a reply", but refused to say it?
Unless they accept it. Then you might get new directives(like with the water one), or at least you can get a chance to get them to court if they fail to take further legal action if they fuck it up(cage example)
>When the other anon said that the Commission is just going to talk about it, and you said that "you don't understand how this works"... what exactly did you mean?
My post(>>105754231) was in response to >>105754179 and >>105754194. >>105754179 claimed it's just a regular online petition and >>105754194 said they don't have to listen or do anything. Which is obviously wrong because ECI is not really a typical online petition and they are obligated to listen and respond. The anon who said they are just going to talk about it(>>105754384) posted few posts after I made my own post. 105754384 is bigger than 105754384. He is obviously right, they are only legally obligated to listen and respond, not to accept any proposed law, which is something I have said so multiple times ITT.
>Did you want to imply that this actually has the chance to change something?
Yes there is.
>Or did you actually always know that you will only "get a reply", but refused to say it?
Unless they accept it. Then you might get new directives(like with the water one), or at least you can get a chance to get them to court if they fail to take further legal action if they fuck it up(cage example)