>>105759453
>I agree on child brides, but Jesus is king. You kike.
Then why do you hate "moloch" so much (it means king).

Jesus, of the New Testament we have now, hates men.
1) "better a millstone for pedos"
2) "don't stone woman though"
3) "chop your dick and balls off for heaven (matthew 19, greek)
4) "malless who look at women have committed adultery" "btw women can fuck whomever they wish, no stone" "dig out maallesss eyes if their eyes cause them to sin" "chop off maaalless hands if it causes them to sin".
5) "I abolosied YHWH's Law! (ignore the next sentance) matthew!"
6) DIE FOR THE WOMAN
7) man is "husband" (caretaker) now, not "ba'al" (ruler, lord)
8) obey ALL earthly rulers!

>But it didn't say that 1700 years ago!
Coptic christians were chopping the dick and balls off boys up till the british stopped them in 1895. Yes it did say that then.
The earliest african christian chopped his genitals off.

oh and
9) "your father is the Adversary, he was a liar and murderer from the begining" "my kingdom is not of THIS world" "your god is the God of THIS world"

YHWH is the God of THIS world --psalms (old testament)
YHWH is a deciever.
YHWH killed his enemies.

YHWH allows child brides.

Jesus had a problem with that.
Christians today certainly do.
It is what it is.

Something to visually notice in phonecan: the word moloch looks like this written:

𐤌𐤋𐤊 "king"

𐤋𐤌𐤋𐤊 "of the king"
YHWH
Coincidence?