>>105779470
>imagine giving more power to the state because you wanted muh child video game forever.
it's not giving more power, it's seeing if it can put the power it already has, towards something that a fair number of people can agree would be a good thing to do.
>Companies should have the freedom to sell shitty product if they want to as you should have the freedom to not buy
companies already sell shitty products. the only problem is they're not advertised as shitty, they're adverised as better than they actually are. in some cases this kills people.

are you gonna read every EULA of every "live service" you buy? are you gonna buy a testing kit for every tool and spare part to make sure it meets the advertised ratings and doesn't kill you or set your house on fire? no you're fucking not. does that mean it's fine for chinks to chink you and for the jews to jew you? you seem to think that yes, it is, because you've been watching a fuckload of Milton Friedman clips on youtube lately and are convinced that any gubmint intervention is bad by default.