Anonymous
7/2/2025, 8:54:20 PM
No.105779990
>>105779883
>and are convinced that any gubmint intervention is bad by default.
I'm the other guy arguing against him and in all honesty I'd agree that this IS a good default to have. It's just that the default assumption is not always correct, and sometimes government regulation is a necessary evil.
Maybe if we lived in an anarchy it would be a different question, but the companies are more than happy to lobby in the government to push laws and regulations that benefit them. It's only fair that sometimes the citizens do the same.
>>105779941
>seriously anon? the magical government is gonna make sure all firearms never fail. why didn't we think this before? its so obvious.
Yes. What the fuck do you think CIP is? For the record, a substantial chunk of firearms imported from yankland don't even pass basic CIP tests and get sent back as failures.
Sure, there's a contract between the seller and the purchaser. I have no problem with the purchaser being allowed to define the contracts through legal means.
>Companies should have the freedom to sell a product that can expire whenever they want assuming they informed their customers before buying.
I disagree. I'm more than happy with there being state enforced warranties and refund periods, or permanent ownership that the company can't retract at will.
>and are convinced that any gubmint intervention is bad by default.
I'm the other guy arguing against him and in all honesty I'd agree that this IS a good default to have. It's just that the default assumption is not always correct, and sometimes government regulation is a necessary evil.
Maybe if we lived in an anarchy it would be a different question, but the companies are more than happy to lobby in the government to push laws and regulations that benefit them. It's only fair that sometimes the citizens do the same.
>>105779941
>seriously anon? the magical government is gonna make sure all firearms never fail. why didn't we think this before? its so obvious.
Yes. What the fuck do you think CIP is? For the record, a substantial chunk of firearms imported from yankland don't even pass basic CIP tests and get sent back as failures.
Sure, there's a contract between the seller and the purchaser. I have no problem with the purchaser being allowed to define the contracts through legal means.
>Companies should have the freedom to sell a product that can expire whenever they want assuming they informed their customers before buying.
I disagree. I'm more than happy with there being state enforced warranties and refund periods, or permanent ownership that the company can't retract at will.