Anonymous
7/2/2025, 10:34:41 PM
No.105780969
>>105780879
No matter how you slice it your analogy is dumb. Digital goods don't "expire" or have "wear and tear" it's all arbitrary. Without effort from the developer to make it that way, games don't suddenly stop working. At best it would make sense in talking about games from Windows 95 not working on Windows 11 and calling that natural deterioration over time. And I absolutely do "own" my DRM-free GoG game download, I can put it on a USB drive and install it on every computer I own if I choose. I'm not trying to reprint the t-shirt which your dumb IP argument would also apply to but NO ONE said this, you are bringing it up. No, I don't have the right to go to a factory and get reprints of my Spider-Man red t-shirt. That doesn't mean I don't own the shirt...
>If the core of your argument is about intellectual property, great, that's what my point has been the entire time.
That has nothing to do with anything said so far, stop writing random things.
>If the core of your argument is about ownership, however, I'm afraid you just don't make sense.
You are the one who clearly is confused what "owning" things made. But tracks given "rent" befuddled you and you never actually refuted by counterpoint so now you just make these flaccid random tangeant points because you can't help but write noise to feel smart. You are replying to the wrong person and I would've thought getting whupped on "Rent" would've told you to find a different thread to sound smart in.
No matter how you slice it your analogy is dumb. Digital goods don't "expire" or have "wear and tear" it's all arbitrary. Without effort from the developer to make it that way, games don't suddenly stop working. At best it would make sense in talking about games from Windows 95 not working on Windows 11 and calling that natural deterioration over time. And I absolutely do "own" my DRM-free GoG game download, I can put it on a USB drive and install it on every computer I own if I choose. I'm not trying to reprint the t-shirt which your dumb IP argument would also apply to but NO ONE said this, you are bringing it up. No, I don't have the right to go to a factory and get reprints of my Spider-Man red t-shirt. That doesn't mean I don't own the shirt...
>If the core of your argument is about intellectual property, great, that's what my point has been the entire time.
That has nothing to do with anything said so far, stop writing random things.
>If the core of your argument is about ownership, however, I'm afraid you just don't make sense.
You are the one who clearly is confused what "owning" things made. But tracks given "rent" befuddled you and you never actually refuted by counterpoint so now you just make these flaccid random tangeant points because you can't help but write noise to feel smart. You are replying to the wrong person and I would've thought getting whupped on "Rent" would've told you to find a different thread to sound smart in.