Anonymous
7/5/2025, 2:01:20 PM
No.105807559
>>105807539
No, they are not wrong.
The 3rd circuit federal appeals judge is right:
>("[N]onexclusive licenses are revocable absent consideration."). Lulirama Ltd. v. Axcess Broad. Servs., Inc., 128 F.3d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1997); see also Carson v. Dynegy, Inc., 344 F.3d 446, 451 (5th Cir. 2003).
Not your lower-court judge in the 9th circuit: who was REVERSED by the 9th circuit appelate judges.
No, they are not wrong.
The 3rd circuit federal appeals judge is right:
>("[N]onexclusive licenses are revocable absent consideration."). Lulirama Ltd. v. Axcess Broad. Servs., Inc., 128 F.3d 872, 882 (5th Cir. 1997); see also Carson v. Dynegy, Inc., 344 F.3d 446, 451 (5th Cir. 2003).
Not your lower-court judge in the 9th circuit: who was REVERSED by the 9th circuit appelate judges.