Anonymous
7/8/2025, 6:02:47 PM
No.105838897
>>105838813
Asus has a better osd/firmware, no forced pixel refreshes (I believe), you can disable pixel shift, more crap
MSI updated atleast the 4k models to move the pixel refresh window from every 16h accumulated to 24h being the forced limit
AOC well.. refer to >>105832060
>Is it worth paying
well compared to the cheapest 4k240 models to say the asus rog ones there is a 500 bux difference
this is the price I am forced to pay to get a functional osd that does not annoy you
if you find it as annoying as me 150 is a tiny premium to pay I would literally pay 500 more for the same panel but just a better firmware
yeah I wish other manufacturers were more competent but they won't fix their shit until they realize the error of their ways, msi started to learn a bit, but still not enough
so depends how annoyed you will be
me? I consider an implementation like that to be borderline unusable
Asus has a better osd/firmware, no forced pixel refreshes (I believe), you can disable pixel shift, more crap
MSI updated atleast the 4k models to move the pixel refresh window from every 16h accumulated to 24h being the forced limit
AOC well.. refer to >>105832060
>Is it worth paying
well compared to the cheapest 4k240 models to say the asus rog ones there is a 500 bux difference
this is the price I am forced to pay to get a functional osd that does not annoy you
if you find it as annoying as me 150 is a tiny premium to pay I would literally pay 500 more for the same panel but just a better firmware
yeah I wish other manufacturers were more competent but they won't fix their shit until they realize the error of their ways, msi started to learn a bit, but still not enough
so depends how annoyed you will be
me? I consider an implementation like that to be borderline unusable