Anonymous
7/12/2025, 5:22:18 PM
No.105882064
On /aicg/ “bushes” is shorthand for pubic hair on the bot’s character card art.
It’s not about gardening or 3-D renders; it’s specifically whether the girl (or guy/futa/etc.) drawn in the reference picture has a visible bush or is completely shaved.
Because most cards are anime-style, the default is usually hairless or just a tiny gradient, so any artist who draws a thick, detailed tuft instantly becomes a topic.
Typical argument threads look like this:
1. OP drops a new card
>New tomboy baker card, link in bin. She’s got a full 80s bush in the ref because it fits the theme.
>Hope you guys like whole-wheat.
2. First replies split into camps
>Team Bush:
>>Finally some variety. Shaved loli #5823 gets old.
>>It’s canon to the 90s setting, cope.
>
>Team Shave:
>>Disgusting, dropped. I don’t want to imagine flossing with that while I’m cooming.
>>Artist is a degenerate hairfag, filtering.
3. Escalation
>Someone posts a side-by-side edit where the bush is erased and calls it the “fixed” version.
>>You literally just airbrushed her crotch into a Barbie doll, that’s not fixing anything.
>Counter-edit appears with an even bigger bush and a watermark “COALITION FOR CURLIES”.
>Thread derails into whether pubic hair is “more hygienic” or “roach motel”, complete with unsourced screenshots from Reddit.
4. Meta-arguments
>“Bushchads keep winning” vs “Smoothbrain pedo coomers”.
>Accusations that the jannies prune bush threads faster than shave threads.
>Someone claims LoRA training data is 97 % shaved so any bush card is doomed to token bleed.
5. Eventual timeloop
>Anon posts the pasta:
>Reminder that whether you like it bald, trimmed, or Amazon rainforest, the real redpill is that none of you have touched grass, let alone pussy. Thread dies at 310 replies.
It’s not about gardening or 3-D renders; it’s specifically whether the girl (or guy/futa/etc.) drawn in the reference picture has a visible bush or is completely shaved.
Because most cards are anime-style, the default is usually hairless or just a tiny gradient, so any artist who draws a thick, detailed tuft instantly becomes a topic.
Typical argument threads look like this:
1. OP drops a new card
>New tomboy baker card, link in bin. She’s got a full 80s bush in the ref because it fits the theme.
>Hope you guys like whole-wheat.
2. First replies split into camps
>Team Bush:
>>Finally some variety. Shaved loli #5823 gets old.
>>It’s canon to the 90s setting, cope.
>
>Team Shave:
>>Disgusting, dropped. I don’t want to imagine flossing with that while I’m cooming.
>>Artist is a degenerate hairfag, filtering.
3. Escalation
>Someone posts a side-by-side edit where the bush is erased and calls it the “fixed” version.
>>You literally just airbrushed her crotch into a Barbie doll, that’s not fixing anything.
>Counter-edit appears with an even bigger bush and a watermark “COALITION FOR CURLIES”.
>Thread derails into whether pubic hair is “more hygienic” or “roach motel”, complete with unsourced screenshots from Reddit.
4. Meta-arguments
>“Bushchads keep winning” vs “Smoothbrain pedo coomers”.
>Accusations that the jannies prune bush threads faster than shave threads.
>Someone claims LoRA training data is 97 % shaved so any bush card is doomed to token bleed.
5. Eventual timeloop
>Anon posts the pasta:
>Reminder that whether you like it bald, trimmed, or Amazon rainforest, the real redpill is that none of you have touched grass, let alone pussy. Thread dies at 310 replies.