Anonymous
7/22/2025, 10:34:20 PM
No.105991725
>>105991643
>And yet you can't do the above
It's impossible to look at any work of art and say with certainty "see, the creator did/didn't mean to convey a subjective impression with this!" ("subjective impression" also being an ill-defined term, but whatever). However, counterexamples are not the only way to disprove a claim.
AI DOES make decisions in creating its work. It recognizes what visual patterns are associated with certain textual ideas, and with its algorithms and probabilistic analysis it determines what seems to be most suitable. I think this fits any reasonable definition of your criteria.
Tell me, does the value of art come from its utility? If so, what utility do you not get from AI generated works?
>And yet you can't do the above
It's impossible to look at any work of art and say with certainty "see, the creator did/didn't mean to convey a subjective impression with this!" ("subjective impression" also being an ill-defined term, but whatever). However, counterexamples are not the only way to disprove a claim.
AI DOES make decisions in creating its work. It recognizes what visual patterns are associated with certain textual ideas, and with its algorithms and probabilistic analysis it determines what seems to be most suitable. I think this fits any reasonable definition of your criteria.
Tell me, does the value of art come from its utility? If so, what utility do you not get from AI generated works?