Anonymous
8/1/2025, 2:31:02 PM
No.106103063
>>106103022
>some new game middle-ware that would have only been viable under the current model
Just make it perpetually licensed and charge more for it. No reason to have every SaaS except for corporate greed.
> taking rights away from creators in order to give rights to consumers. Is this a worthwhile trade-off?
Yes, because consumers have less power proportionally, and there is now an imbalance in the amount of power corporations have over the consumer to control their purchases. This is shit your learn in your first economics class.
> I would like creators to have every available tool to them because creating stuff is a lot harder to mindlessly consuming things.
Then develop innovative solutions that comply with the law, just like we did with Teflon, just like we did with paint, just like we did with cars.
>consumers should simply vote with their wallets.
Consumers cannot vote with their wallets when every game is moving toward the same model.
>some new game middle-ware that would have only been viable under the current model
Just make it perpetually licensed and charge more for it. No reason to have every SaaS except for corporate greed.
> taking rights away from creators in order to give rights to consumers. Is this a worthwhile trade-off?
Yes, because consumers have less power proportionally, and there is now an imbalance in the amount of power corporations have over the consumer to control their purchases. This is shit your learn in your first economics class.
> I would like creators to have every available tool to them because creating stuff is a lot harder to mindlessly consuming things.
Then develop innovative solutions that comply with the law, just like we did with Teflon, just like we did with paint, just like we did with cars.
>consumers should simply vote with their wallets.
Consumers cannot vote with their wallets when every game is moving toward the same model.