>>106165153
>capping my fps gave me 100's of fps higher % lows
give me a reference of which games you can show this on? I will wait
it was like hundreds of fps higher % lows, seemed abnormally strange
this was long ago on a youtube video testing cs2 engine
seems extremely jank
to use it as some kind of benchmark of which card is better on a engine that is completely jank is still, jank
no I will not take cs2 engine benchmarks as valid fuel for gpu flame wars, next

>>106165132
seems jank to me

>>106165344
>I tried using strobing at 360hz on other games and it would give me a headache after awhile probably due to some of the double imaging and judder from the frame rate dropping down.
you should use it with a locked frame rate though to avoid this, isnt this the whole point
you can't have dips

>there's really no point to be using tn panels when 480hz oled exist.
isnt that the whole point if you have lower fps, the lower it get the more benefit the strong will have
at 240 vs 240 lcd strobed the lcd will be way clearer
500 vs 500 less

>>106165392
no clue I just saw people testing it when it was released

>>106165872
HWUB already got the 240 but only the 165 variants are listed here
>I wonder if this coating could be applied to QD-OLEDs as well or if they are already as glossy as possible.
you can peel off the plastic layer antiglare coating on all qdoleds and get a mirror tier finish that is even glossier and easier to clean but 0 anti reflective properties, you can't do the same on woleds due the possibility of fucking up the polarizer and destroying your entire monitor
>Also disappointing that these models still are only have DP 1.4 and mus rely on DSC.
and nerfed usb-c power delivery