>>106253295
>you're shilling
>companies are all colluding
I'm literally being paid human money to argue with absolute retards on /g/, yes
it's all a big conspiracy to get you
I'm in your walls
>you trade off convenience for minor imperceptible sound quality loss
ftfy
>for pollution and wastefulness because its more profitable for a corpo to sell you buds that die instead of ones that don't.
you're literally whining that you can't buy a new device that you want when your old device still works
>>106253312
>my argument was that you should at least have the choice.
you do https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2024&chk35mm=selected
458 phones just in the past 2 years
>actually yes they are. they have a whole name for this concept: planned obsolescence.
>I am forced to replace my phone because planned obsolescence CONCEPT exists
have you been officially diagnosed