Anonymous
8/18/2025, 6:53:40 PM
No.106303430
>>106303143
I would say that making equivalent performance much, much cheaper is certainly a "next level" development.
>more likely companies just won't pass cost savings onto consumers
There will continue to be luxury brands that are expensive for no good reason, and there will also be cheap brands that emerge.
>>106303173
>working in extended temperature ranges
No way, is that true? Why would the performance in cold areas be any different than lithium?
>way higher charge cycle
I've heard this too. Again, I have no idea WHY this would be true, so it could all be hype, but that alone makes them worth it over lithium even if they were more expensive.
I would say that making equivalent performance much, much cheaper is certainly a "next level" development.
>more likely companies just won't pass cost savings onto consumers
There will continue to be luxury brands that are expensive for no good reason, and there will also be cheap brands that emerge.
>>106303173
>working in extended temperature ranges
No way, is that true? Why would the performance in cold areas be any different than lithium?
>way higher charge cycle
I've heard this too. Again, I have no idea WHY this would be true, so it could all be hype, but that alone makes them worth it over lithium even if they were more expensive.