>>106327891
The retards who were doing that ironically deserve the temp ban in a
>Hey, knock it the fuck off. You think its funny, but its against the rules and you're going to get us shit on heavily. We are paying attention
way is fine. However just any random fag that was there not posting that shit, or who joined years ago and never dropped the room or whatever the fuck else shouldn't be vulnerable to the same thing. After all this is Discord, its not like they 'cant tell' because everything is top down and open to them since its centralized. Of course, we're also assuming that "violent extremism" only applies to literal fedposting that someone wants to kill the president's best friend's dog in minecraft tomorrow at 3PM and not a lot of other hypothetically "problematic" shit. I'd be fine with users who were on a server who got locked like this getting a notification as to why, but not some sort of ban or account action that goes beyond that server is simply guilt-by-association and there is no room for that. I don't know why its so difficult to just action the people involved in the bad content and notify the rest if they weren't?

>>106328079
>You people
You have no idea who I am and you've already built up your culture warrior strawman.
>Don't do weird shit
That's the fun part, "weird shit" is totally subjective and if we enable people to claim that "Well you people and what you are doing is weird and icky and problematic" without universally applied rulesets then it will end up with a type of favoritism that becomes very apparent where certain types of language gets actioned far quicker than others, usually with a
>its not happening
>Okay fine its happening but uh its actually good
sequence of nonsense. Instead its better to have a fair, universally applied, clearly defined ruleset and consequences thereof..