>>106367205
Interesting, why do you think visible sages would improve threads?

>>106367236
>How does the OP of a 4chan thread proves to your central server that he is actually OP?
meh, that's an implementation detail. I'm sure there is a better way, but maybe IPs would be enough for a start.
>I don't believe that OP owns a thread
Do you think mods own the site then, just because they have the ability to moderate?
>what's interesting is that it evolves often in unexpected ways
I don't think an extension like that would prevent this. It would depend on the OP, and also you get to toggle collapsing per-thread if you don't like what the OP is doing. Of course it's cool when a thread develops organically, but very often I see people attempt to slide threads with /pol/ stuff which is usually no fun.
>Let's be honest, the percentage of 4channers that would use your extension would be also very small.
Why? I think 4chanx has a significant userbase.
Again, the point of this is that there is no barrier to entry. If no one is using it, you still see the usual 4chan posts. Very different from opening and posting on another site which is a barren wasteland.

>>106367309
Is any change whatsoever automatically equivalent to turning 4chan into reddit?