>>106371449
>Someone would need to design an AI that is just a reasoning core, one with motivations and the ability to make decisions abstractly
With about five seconds of thinking my idea is to make a reasoning core out of a fuckload of Prolog statements. Use the existing language models to parse the input into a precise logical statement and read the output
>>106371523
Because nearly every instance of “how many ‘r’s are in <word>” in the training data is followed by “3.” Once again, there’s no thought involved, it’s all statistics and probabilities