OP
8/24/2025, 10:49:27 PM
No.106371799
>>106371574
>>106371763
That could work, but the jank.. No reason not to do it properly. It's a central point of failure but so is 4chan. Not a privacy concern since you'll be able to audit the client side code, which shouldn't be very long.
>>106371763
That could work, but the jank.. No reason not to do it properly. It's a central point of failure but so is 4chan. Not a privacy concern since you'll be able to audit the client side code, which shouldn't be very long.