>>106395935
Yeah I expected this. Steelmanning everyone I have to count five people.
>1
Challenge poster
>2
namefag
>3
Anon different from #1, since they obviously left after posting with a bizarre fixation for not making a thread themselves.
Here we can say the first point is disconnected from any accusation since everyone is anonymous, and the replier just wanted shitty discussion out of an (entirely understandable) hate for all namefags.
>4
Guess.
>5
>me

I don't care. Feel free to harass anyone from staff over anyone who was or is not someone else, I felt like shoving "provoke" there to bait everyone's '>projecting' reflex. You have to admit #3 made an assumption or take the chance at backing out like the faggot I can believe you are.

Remember, nobody started it if none of us exist anyway.