>>106403411
>Sorry I assumed you were this anon
It's alright. It happens on an anonymous site.
Sorry for responding in such a heated way.

>If they are taking their own pictures and sharing them with other children over secure channels, there are no adults suffering for this anyway, so it is a different case than the one we were arguing about.
>If an adult is accessing the images, the adult is no longer unrelated.
Agreed.
The point of my post wasn't to add to the broader conversation, but only to respond to the Anon who said that kids don't produce csam on their own, to tell him that they do and that kids in modern society are no longer "innocent" as kids used to be in the past.
It was just a parenthesis, not an argument against anything else that was said previously.