>>106515325
Correct. Statically linking libc is retarded, especially on systems where libc is considered the stable interface to the platform because the kernel ABI changes often. However, the point being made in >>106514884 indicates rust binaries are fully statically linked, which is not the case on Windows, OSX, *BSD, or Linux due to rust, by default, using libc as the interface to the platform. This is an argument about statements of fact, not an argument about what people ought to do.