Anonymous
10/13/2025, 3:13:31 PM
No.106874068
>>106874030
>it's not easy to write code that is too broken to require a debugger in rust for most "end developers".
That is true. I have been writing in Rust for many years now and most of the problems I face are statically detected. Only small part ends up in runtime and printing is more than enough to solve them. I only ever had to use a debugger twice over all these years.
>but this is probably offset by the sample being not random, and coming from retards who would require such an IDE to develop shit.
This survey is based on users of jetbrains IDEs.
There is nothing wrong with using IDEs, everyone use them professionally.
>it's not easy to write code that is too broken to require a debugger in rust for most "end developers".
That is true. I have been writing in Rust for many years now and most of the problems I face are statically detected. Only small part ends up in runtime and printing is more than enough to solve them. I only ever had to use a debugger twice over all these years.
>but this is probably offset by the sample being not random, and coming from retards who would require such an IDE to develop shit.
This survey is based on users of jetbrains IDEs.
There is nothing wrong with using IDEs, everyone use them professionally.