Anonymous
10/16/2025, 3:35:54 PM
No.106908207
>>106906949
Wake me up when ipv6 has human readable addresses. I don't give a rat fuck how much better ipv6 is, I can't remember addresses that complex.
>Just use DNS to point to things you tard
Why? I can easily remember the pattern we use for stuff internally in the company, and adding DNS to the mix is just another point of failure when a piece of equipment gets put into or taken out of service, so say nothing of how much of a shitfest DNS propagation itself is.
>>106907859
>If an ISP is not retarded it will give you at least a /64 subnet, which means the first half will be decided by your ISP and the second half is decided by you, your router or your devices, according to your configuration.
>non retarded ISP
Meanwhile in reality half the ISPs outside of korea and some parts of Europe don't even support IPv6. You literally can't GET an ipv6 address on any of the fiber companies in my state. It's IPv4 all the way.
Frontier is /allegedly/ rolling out IPv6 support the same way they have been for the last 3 years. They were initially planning on something like /120, but their engineering team bitched about it. 2ish years ago they were waiting on firmware fixes from Juniper. Who knows what the hold up is, but it's been at least 3 years at this point and no progress.
Ironically, comcast has zero problems with ipv6, although you may have to inquire about it depending on the region you're in.
>>106907941
>NAT is a done at the router and takes away a ton of compute resources.
We've had hardware optimized for this for multiple decades now. It's a solved problem.
Wake me up when ipv6 has human readable addresses. I don't give a rat fuck how much better ipv6 is, I can't remember addresses that complex.
>Just use DNS to point to things you tard
Why? I can easily remember the pattern we use for stuff internally in the company, and adding DNS to the mix is just another point of failure when a piece of equipment gets put into or taken out of service, so say nothing of how much of a shitfest DNS propagation itself is.
>>106907859
>If an ISP is not retarded it will give you at least a /64 subnet, which means the first half will be decided by your ISP and the second half is decided by you, your router or your devices, according to your configuration.
>non retarded ISP
Meanwhile in reality half the ISPs outside of korea and some parts of Europe don't even support IPv6. You literally can't GET an ipv6 address on any of the fiber companies in my state. It's IPv4 all the way.
Frontier is /allegedly/ rolling out IPv6 support the same way they have been for the last 3 years. They were initially planning on something like /120, but their engineering team bitched about it. 2ish years ago they were waiting on firmware fixes from Juniper. Who knows what the hold up is, but it's been at least 3 years at this point and no progress.
Ironically, comcast has zero problems with ipv6, although you may have to inquire about it depending on the region you're in.
>>106907941
>NAT is a done at the router and takes away a ton of compute resources.
We've had hardware optimized for this for multiple decades now. It's a solved problem.