>>106915015
if your company disables privacy extensions, they also require you to use a vpn and likely use a tls-inspecting firewall
ipv4 wont help you there
>>106917276
>static
you have to go out of your way to get a static v6
you have as much control over your v6 prefix as you do a v4, you are entirely at your ISP's mercy
when i had google fiber i effectively had static v4 and v6 because they never changed, the municipal isp i currently have rotates both weekly
>>106908784
its like the credit card industry in the US
theres a reason insane CC rewards only exist in the US: no other civilized country allows payment processors to rentseek 2-5% (or 10% if youre in adult industries) of every tx
but it will never change because consumers and banks have gotten fat off the "rewards" programs at the expense of small stores that pay higher fees due to being unable to negotiate large discounts
>>106912501
my company switched to v6-only internally with dual-stack externally and it solved so many problems
we exhaused the RFC1918 ranges in the 00s and eventually had to setup multiple NATs within our internal network
it was nightmarish to maintain
so sounds like a skill issue on your end