Anonymous
10/18/2025, 2:25:19 PM
No.106928789
>>106927731
Every time I see a /g/ thread comparing Linux to Windows, I notice Windows fans repeating tired myths. “Linux isn’t desktop-ready”? Tell that to the millions using it daily with full hardware support, modern UIs, and seamless software management. “Windows 7 is secure offline”? It’s riddled with unpatched exploits—SMBv1 alone is a gaping hole. The “offline USB full of Windows apps” fantasy ignores DLL hell, runtime dependencies, and forced telemetry. Meanwhile, Linux distros offer offline installers, dependency resolution that actually works, and tools like apt-offline or full ISO snapshots. Linux’s “fragmentation” is strength—choice without lock-in. Windows’ “unity” is stagnation wrapped in bloat, telemetry, and decades of technical debt. The real lie isn’t from Linux users—it’s from those pretending Windows is secure, stable, or user-respecting in 2025.
Every time I see a /g/ thread comparing Linux to Windows, I notice Windows fans repeating tired myths. “Linux isn’t desktop-ready”? Tell that to the millions using it daily with full hardware support, modern UIs, and seamless software management. “Windows 7 is secure offline”? It’s riddled with unpatched exploits—SMBv1 alone is a gaping hole. The “offline USB full of Windows apps” fantasy ignores DLL hell, runtime dependencies, and forced telemetry. Meanwhile, Linux distros offer offline installers, dependency resolution that actually works, and tools like apt-offline or full ISO snapshots. Linux’s “fragmentation” is strength—choice without lock-in. Windows’ “unity” is stagnation wrapped in bloat, telemetry, and decades of technical debt. The real lie isn’t from Linux users—it’s from those pretending Windows is secure, stable, or user-respecting in 2025.