Anonymous
10/27/2025, 10:48:45 PM
No.107026790
>>107024134
Most EU sets after the first few generations supported PAL60 or SECAM, which had 60 Hz output combined with all the benefits of color fidelity and visual clarity that the PAL signal composition had over the shitty ill-devised NTSC signal.
Also 50 Hz is actually closer to the 23.976 used for film, which meant PAL regions actually got an experience with movies far, FAR closer to their native recording rate than NTSC where all kinds of fuckery was needed to make it work. PAL could just upscale the entire movie's speed by slightly over a single frame per second which is all but unnoticeable. Whereas NTSC required pulldown trickery, frame removal, and frame duplication. Often leading to jitter, judder, and stilted motion in badly mastered materials.
Most EU sets after the first few generations supported PAL60 or SECAM, which had 60 Hz output combined with all the benefits of color fidelity and visual clarity that the PAL signal composition had over the shitty ill-devised NTSC signal.
Also 50 Hz is actually closer to the 23.976 used for film, which meant PAL regions actually got an experience with movies far, FAR closer to their native recording rate than NTSC where all kinds of fuckery was needed to make it work. PAL could just upscale the entire movie's speed by slightly over a single frame per second which is all but unnoticeable. Whereas NTSC required pulldown trickery, frame removal, and frame duplication. Often leading to jitter, judder, and stilted motion in badly mastered materials.