Anonymous
11/8/2025, 10:28:53 PM
No.107146725
>>107146598
I agree but I also emphatize with the maintainers that are spreaded thin and are responsible for huge swaths of abandoned hackage things. You can convince them of accepting breakage if you bundle a ton of base changes.
>>107146627
Yes and no. The easy implementation of record update is indeed just lens. But there's always somebody that wants to do multi field multi polymorphic type changes that require destructuring and reconstructing the whole thing in one go (one of the things that block implementing overloaded record update).
>>107146634
Yes.
>>107146661
Gonna need to convince college prof nerds to rally around.
I agree but I also emphatize with the maintainers that are spreaded thin and are responsible for huge swaths of abandoned hackage things. You can convince them of accepting breakage if you bundle a ton of base changes.
>>107146627
Yes and no. The easy implementation of record update is indeed just lens. But there's always somebody that wants to do multi field multi polymorphic type changes that require destructuring and reconstructing the whole thing in one go (one of the things that block implementing overloaded record update).
>>107146634
Yes.
>>107146661
Gonna need to convince college prof nerds to rally around.