Anonymous
10/26/2025, 7:13:04 AM
No.462528
>>462524
Everything you just said is all true, and it perfectly describes why I hate graphic design, interior design, home Reno shows, most "art" based industries in general.
It's not about making something that tells it's own story or has its own personality, it's about trying to robotically generate something that appeals to everyone to sell as many products as possible, so they make something so bland, so generic, so uninspired and pedestrian, that it appeals to no one, but is merely "meh" to most observers. They really want to just make something that doesn't OFFEND anyone and turn away customers. But everyone knows brilliant art is bold and not afraid to offend. But that is not compatible with maximizing sales. It's the reason most people can't tell the difference between an AI generated logo and a human created one: both are based on the most generic conglomeration of training data, either in the machine, as in the case of AI, or the human's brain at cal arts when they drop $60,000 to learn Toon Boom and draw bean mouths to please their industry overlords with generic crap that some risk-averse producer thinks will sell well.
Then these designers whine about
>AI SLOP AI SLOP ITS SOULLESS AND TAKING OUR JERBS!!!! MUH JERB! WE ARE TRUE ARTISTS CRANKING OUT THOUGHTFUL ART, NOT DA CLANKERZ AND EEEEEVIL TECH BROS!!!!!
MUH JERB MUH JERB!!! CLANKERZ WILL NOT REPLACE US!!!!!(insert illogical and legally unprecedented nonsense about training data being copyright infringement in a desperate effort to build some kind of argument that doesn't sound like it's based purely on emotion and fear of being replaced by a slopbot better at generating slop than themselves)
Everything you just said is all true, and it perfectly describes why I hate graphic design, interior design, home Reno shows, most "art" based industries in general.
It's not about making something that tells it's own story or has its own personality, it's about trying to robotically generate something that appeals to everyone to sell as many products as possible, so they make something so bland, so generic, so uninspired and pedestrian, that it appeals to no one, but is merely "meh" to most observers. They really want to just make something that doesn't OFFEND anyone and turn away customers. But everyone knows brilliant art is bold and not afraid to offend. But that is not compatible with maximizing sales. It's the reason most people can't tell the difference between an AI generated logo and a human created one: both are based on the most generic conglomeration of training data, either in the machine, as in the case of AI, or the human's brain at cal arts when they drop $60,000 to learn Toon Boom and draw bean mouths to please their industry overlords with generic crap that some risk-averse producer thinks will sell well.
Then these designers whine about
>AI SLOP AI SLOP ITS SOULLESS AND TAKING OUR JERBS!!!! MUH JERB! WE ARE TRUE ARTISTS CRANKING OUT THOUGHTFUL ART, NOT DA CLANKERZ AND EEEEEVIL TECH BROS!!!!!
MUH JERB MUH JERB!!! CLANKERZ WILL NOT REPLACE US!!!!!(insert illogical and legally unprecedented nonsense about training data being copyright infringement in a desperate effort to build some kind of argument that doesn't sound like it's based purely on emotion and fear of being replaced by a slopbot better at generating slop than themselves)