>>29293022
No, I'm not failing to grasp what you're saying, I'm asserting my moral position against you. I'm calling you a failure because I deem you such, not because I "assume" that people "need" to contribute to "society". I differentiate between "society" and "humanity", believing the former to be more of a condition that arises within humanity. I make moral judgements based on what I consider to be health, and I base health on one's capacity to further biological aims, rooted in drives. If you refuse to help advance the species, I see you as a genetic failure, possessing a very limited capacity to further anything, no matter how subjective your aims might be. If you're like that, I regard you as a failure.

And you've given me no reason to want to know you any better. A cost of being a gross freak like you are. You don't care, fine.