>>29688348
>Truly the golden age of porn ..After the 80s/90s with the advent of digital technology the porn scene really took a nosedive.
>>29688370
>Couldn't agree more. It's not just the digital technology alone, but the performers have also gotten less attractive. Most of the porn stars posted on /gif/ look like bug eyed children who don't know how to style hair. It seems like to compensate for this, they're following a checklist of things that get people aroused based on focus group studies or some shit. They aren't naturally arousing, they're purely by the numbers. It really shows now with how common those fucking anime ahegao faces are in current mainstream porn which brings us back to the digital technology problem.
Yep. Vintage porn threads are always popular for a reason.

>>29688387
>Also back in the 80s/90s porn was much harder to aquire ..You really cherished every tape and took a real pride in your collection.
More will mean worse. There have been studies that show the more readily available something is the worse standards become.