>>2556907
>>2556911
>>2556915
It's both. I'm not kidding. I know 'both sides' is an argument that the left and the right both groan at but it's fucking true in this case. Both sides have contingents that hate porn.

On the right there always has been, and still is, a large population of religiously motivated people who think that any expression of sexuality is wrong. The sort of people who legitimately dream up and try to implement something like Project 2025. These people are real, very prevalent, and have a lot of influence. There's no denying that.
There's also a much smaller subsection of the alt-right that isn't religiously motivated, but still anti-porn and anti-sexual expression because they think it's 'healthier' and think they're morally superior for not consuming porn, and want to discourage it for others.
There's also a fair number of men on the internet who I assume still consume porn on a regular basis, and aren't necessarily politically motivated, but lash out at female content creators and get them driven off platforms for a variety of reasons.
On the left yes, it's absolutely true that feminism and the way that media perception has shifted in the last few years has made it much more unpopular for there to be adult content targeted specifically at straight men or to have conventionally attractive women in products you're trying to sell.
Some people will shut down any hint of female sexuality if they think it could be appealing to men. Just go on tiktok or instagram and despite all the thirst traps you see on there, you'll also see endless seas of women complaining about it using feminist language and talking points.
In my city, there was a female politician years ago who spoke of wanting to shut down strip clubs under the banner of 'protecting women.' The same logic is applied to porn as well. Many people see it as sexually exploitative to women, regardless of whether or not they're engaging in it consensually and knowledgeably, or having fun with it.