>>17758783
>Your a priori reasoning is useless here.
You're an idiot
>It is different from knowledge that comes from practical experience, which can be applied universally
What is? What are you even talking about, genius? Do you even know what the word empirical means?
>Do you even know how empiricism works?
I told you what it means, it is an epistemology which rejects the justification of belief by any other means but sense-perception.
>Often, empirical knowledge is that knowledge transferred from generation to generation.
This is knowledge from tradition, which is sometimes accepted by empiricists, but that only highlights the inconsistencies of empiricists' beliefs.
>An example is a farmer who knows exactly when to plant and harvest each vegetable without needing a course, just because he learned from experience and previous results
This involves no theory or hypothesis, just as I stated.
>You don't understand philosophy, much less mythology, and stop using Wikipedia and chatgpt, it's shameful.
You're an idiot. Clowns like you are walking arguments against democracy. I told you what empiricism is, I do not subscribe to it, nor am I a pagan. While empirical evidences are a valid source of knowledge they are not the only one, and the only basis for human knowledge is the revelation of God.