Anonymous
6/30/2025, 11:08:44 PM
No.17804612
>>17804589
>Appeal to tradition fallacy.
No it isn't, you claimed that children are physically unprepared for sex, which was the claim I was responding to. I was not making a value judgement.
>"Sexual experience" is not the same as being physically prepared for penetration anon.
Not all sexual activities are penetrative, the majority of adult-child sexual relations are not. And pre-pubertal girls can engage in penetrative activities, some primitive societies actually believe that it is necessary for girls to engage in coitus for them to attain puberty, from that thread:
Alkatcho, Colombia
>Goldman (1963:p369): “[…] coitus was thought to be required by all just pre-pubescent children to promote physical growth. Young boys were told by their older age-group, “you better catch a woman pretty soon or you won’t grow”. It was also believed that defloration was necessary to bring on the first menses in girls”.
>Appeal to tradition fallacy.
No it isn't, you claimed that children are physically unprepared for sex, which was the claim I was responding to. I was not making a value judgement.
>"Sexual experience" is not the same as being physically prepared for penetration anon.
Not all sexual activities are penetrative, the majority of adult-child sexual relations are not. And pre-pubertal girls can engage in penetrative activities, some primitive societies actually believe that it is necessary for girls to engage in coitus for them to attain puberty, from that thread:
Alkatcho, Colombia
>Goldman (1963:p369): “[…] coitus was thought to be required by all just pre-pubescent children to promote physical growth. Young boys were told by their older age-group, “you better catch a woman pretty soon or you won’t grow”. It was also believed that defloration was necessary to bring on the first menses in girls”.