Anonymous
7/1/2025, 2:00:33 AM
No.17804982
>>17804533
>they should be considered incapable of consenting to life-changing medical procedures?
1. Circumcisions are normalized on infants
2. Parents can approve or deny life saving or costing procedures on their children all the time
3. That can include purely cosmetic operations based on gender identity, such as plastic surgeries for breasts on teen girls, or manboob removal on boys, etc
If you're allowed to multilate somebody's "natural" reproductive organs for no good reason, and you're allowed to operate on children to renforce their normal gender identity, then there's not much an argument against blocking children getting treatments which just nudge their appearance towards the other sex, if given the same level of scrutiny as the above
pretty sure kids aren't getting their ducks removed or their breasts cut off as part of being trans as well, at least nobody below like 16
>they should be considered incapable of consenting to life-changing medical procedures?
1. Circumcisions are normalized on infants
2. Parents can approve or deny life saving or costing procedures on their children all the time
3. That can include purely cosmetic operations based on gender identity, such as plastic surgeries for breasts on teen girls, or manboob removal on boys, etc
If you're allowed to multilate somebody's "natural" reproductive organs for no good reason, and you're allowed to operate on children to renforce their normal gender identity, then there's not much an argument against blocking children getting treatments which just nudge their appearance towards the other sex, if given the same level of scrutiny as the above
pretty sure kids aren't getting their ducks removed or their breasts cut off as part of being trans as well, at least nobody below like 16