Anonymous
7/3/2025, 3:24:02 AM
No.17810366
>>17810260
>catholics can't actually argue in good faith because it completely btfos their "hope" if they admit that the chances of actually being saved are extremely slim.
The tradtards on here don’t actually know Catholic theology (or any theology), so they just argue their retarded personal opinions and present them as the theological framework of the Catholic Church (or whatever other denomination).
It’s always a pointless argument because you have to actually teach them what they “believe” (since they subscribe to Catholicism or Orthodoxy typically). Once you’ve educated them on their own religion, then you can actually debate their theology. But you never actually reach this point because it would take hours to explain to them that what they’re saying is actually heresy and the Catholic Church would have arrested them for saying such things in the past.
I had a similar issue in a previous thread with a “based TradCath” who was arguing that Jesus took every soul in hell that died prior to 33 AD (like 80 billion people) and took them to heaven. Basically some weird cross between Universalism and the Harrowing of Hell, and he simply refused to admit that almost no denominations subscribe to that interpretation. The most common interpretation is Jesus only saved Biblical figures like Moses, or the righteous only, or even that every soul was given a choice, but most refused. Regardless, every major church believes that the majority of people born prior to 33 AD are currently burning in hell, and he refused to concede this despite being a “TradCath” who apparently subscribes to Universalism.
>catholics can't actually argue in good faith because it completely btfos their "hope" if they admit that the chances of actually being saved are extremely slim.
The tradtards on here don’t actually know Catholic theology (or any theology), so they just argue their retarded personal opinions and present them as the theological framework of the Catholic Church (or whatever other denomination).
It’s always a pointless argument because you have to actually teach them what they “believe” (since they subscribe to Catholicism or Orthodoxy typically). Once you’ve educated them on their own religion, then you can actually debate their theology. But you never actually reach this point because it would take hours to explain to them that what they’re saying is actually heresy and the Catholic Church would have arrested them for saying such things in the past.
I had a similar issue in a previous thread with a “based TradCath” who was arguing that Jesus took every soul in hell that died prior to 33 AD (like 80 billion people) and took them to heaven. Basically some weird cross between Universalism and the Harrowing of Hell, and he simply refused to admit that almost no denominations subscribe to that interpretation. The most common interpretation is Jesus only saved Biblical figures like Moses, or the righteous only, or even that every soul was given a choice, but most refused. Regardless, every major church believes that the majority of people born prior to 33 AD are currently burning in hell, and he refused to concede this despite being a “TradCath” who apparently subscribes to Universalism.